The Dillingham Commission And Its Legacy: Uncovering the Truth Behind America's Immigration Policies

As waves of immigrants arrived on American shores in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, concerns about the impact of these newcomers on the nation's social fabric began to rise. In response to these concerns, the U.S. government established the Dillingham Commission in 1907 to study the effects of immigration and make recommendations for future policies. But the commission's findings and actions would have far-reaching consequences that still resonate today.

The Purpose and Composition of the Dillingham Commission

The Dillingham Commission, officially known as the United States Immigration Commission, was created under the leadership of Senator William P. Dillingham of Vermont. Its primary objective was to investigate the economic and social impact of immigration on American society and propose legislation to regulate the flow of newcomers.

The commission consisted of nine members, including politicians, economists, sociologists, and representatives from various immigrant groups. The diverse composition aimed to ensure a comprehensive and impartial examination of the subject matter.

Inventing the Immigration Problem: The Dillingham Commission and Its Legacy

by Katherine Benton-Cohen(Kindle Edition)

4.3 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	12515 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	344 pages
Screen Reader	:	Supported

FREE

Immigration and the American Melting Pot

At the time, the United States was considered a melting pot, with different ethnic and cultural groups blending together to form a cohesive nation. The commission sought to evaluate if this theory still held true amidst the influx of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, Asia, and the Caribbean.

Through extensive research, investigation, and surveys, the Dillingham Commission found that while some immigrant groups were successfully assimilating, others faced significant barriers in terms of language, education, and discrimination. These findings laid the foundation for the commission's recommendations on immigration policies.

An Era of Bias: The Commission's Recommendations

While the Dillingham Commission aimed to provide objective analysis, its members' personal biases and societal prejudices inevitably influenced its s. The commission's recommendations largely favored restricting immigration from certain countries and regions, particularly those whose immigrants were deemed less capable of assimilation.

One of the commission's most notable proposals was the establishment of a literacy test for immigrants. This test aimed to limit immigration by requiring prospective newcomers to demonstrate a certain level of literacy in English or another specified language. Although the test appeared neutral on the surface, it disproportionately affected immigrants from non-English-speaking countries.

Additionally, the commission advocated for the implementation of a quota system that would allocate immigration slots based on national origins. This quota system primarily aimed to restrict immigration from Southern and Eastern European countries, which were deemed to have less desirable immigrants compared to Northern and Western European countries.

The Immigration Act of 1924

The Dillingham Commission's recommendations heavily influenced the passage of the Immigration Act of 1924, also known as the Johnson–Reed Act. This legislation established strict quotas on immigration, especially targeting groups that had been the subject of the commission's biases.

The act further restricted immigration from Southern and Eastern European countries, effectively reducing the number of immigrants from these regions to a trickle. It also severely limited immigration from Asia and completely excluded immigrants from the Middle East.

The Lingering Legacy and Lessons Learned

The Dillingham Commission's report and subsequent legislation significantly shaped American immigration policies for decades to come. The quota system and literacy test had profound implications on the demographics of the United States, heavily favoring Northern and Western European immigrants and discouraging others from even attempting to immigrate.

The commission's findings and recommendations were driven by biased assumptions about the ability of different ethnic and cultural groups to assimilate. These discriminatory policies fostered an atmosphere of exclusion and limited opportunities for those who did not fit the preferred mold of the time.

Recognizing the flaws inherent in the Dillingham Commission's approach is crucial in understanding the long-lasting effects on American society. It highlights the danger of allowing biases and prejudices to shape public policy, perpetuating discrimination and hindering progress.

The Dillingham Commission's legacy remains a testament to the power of influence and the dangers of allowing personal biases to shape immigration policies. While it sought to address concerns surrounding immigration, its recommendations ultimately perpetuated discrimination and exclusion on a large scale.

Today, as the United States continues to grapple with immigration issues, it is essential to remember the lessons of the past. Striving for fair and inclusive policies that value diversity and equal opportunities will undoubtedly lead to a stronger and more united nation.

Inventing the Immigration Problem: The Dillingham Commission and Its Legacy

by Katherine Benton-Cohen(Kindle Edition)

4.3 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	12515 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	344 pages
Screen Reader	:	Supported

FREE

In 1907 the U.S. Congress created a joint commission to investigate what many Americans saw as a national crisis: an unprecedented number of immigrants flowing into the United States. Experts—women and men trained in the new field of social science—fanned out across the country to collect data on these fresh arrivals. The trove of information they amassed shaped how Americans thought about immigrants, themselves, and the nation’s place in the world. Katherine Benton-Cohen argues that the Dillingham Commission’s legacy continues to inform the ways that U.S. policy addresses questions raised by immigration, over a century later.

Within a decade of its launch, almost all of the commission’s recommendations—including a literacy test, a quota system based on national origin, the continuation of Asian exclusion, and greater federal oversight of immigration policy—were implemented into law. Inventing the Immigration Problem describes the labyrinthine bureaucracy, broad administrative authority, and quantitative record-keeping that followed in the wake of these regulations. Their implementation marks a final turn away from an immigration policy motivated by executive-branch concerns over foreign policy and toward one dictated by domestic labor politics.

The Dillingham Commission—which remains the largest immigration study ever conducted in the United States—reflects its particular moment in time when mass immigration, the birth of modern social science, and an aggressive foreign policy fostered a newly robust and optimistic notion of federal power. Its quintessentially Progressive formulation of America’s immigration problem, and its recommendations, endure today in almost every component of immigration policy, control, and enforcement.